Here I’m trying to track future reading and annotate WHY… because in my life there can be more than one reason to read a book. If I forget my motives, I will wander unintended paths.
This letter to a friend captures my point:
You boasted that you’ve been on GoodReads since 2007–now I wish to exploit your wisdom.
Please tell me if there is a “notes” section where I might annotate my desired reading.
For instance, I have been shredding the hell out of old papers. One of my better searches had to do with my (continuing) studies in the art and science of deception. I am a big fan of Ekman. Now I’ve found that this interest went back a lot farther than I remembered, back when I was studying self-deception in claimed paranormal gifts. (How do you get to the bottom of a lie that the person telling it believes to be true?) This, of course, goes into the heart of “eye-witness testimony” and false memory such as Elizabeth Loftus made so famous in her study of car crashes. You can indeed remember things you have never seen, and utterly believe that you have seen them in real life.
So inside this study of self deception I have now recovered the title of a book “Revelations: Alien Contact and Human Deception by Jacques Vallee” whom you will recall in relation to the book “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.”
I’ve recovered the citation and added it to my GoodReads, because I’m trying to force the tool to capture all the stuff I have “meant” to read. I’m trying to force the tool to give me collections that will be relevant to ongoing work I do.
The study of deception–self and other–is not going to leave my life any time soon. It’s not that I think everyone lies, it’s that so many tellers of tall tales _don’t_ think everyone lies. I’m keen enough on the kind of deception that keeps House, MD on the cynical side of life–but I’m far more interested in the way the unbelievable comes to be believed. This is entirely self serving. I wish to more deeply understand all the impossible things I myself have beheld. When am I confabulating? How does this happen? And when am I able to be certain I really did see it, and though it was an anomaly, it was in fact just what I beheld?
To know thyself, you gotta know thine own bullshit. If you don’t think you’re full of bullshit, you just have to check again. That’s true for me, anyway. Unless I am deceiving myself about it.
So I want to make a note about this Vallee book–because it’s not about studying the UFO’s… but hell, it could be. I’m not averse to reading about UFO’s. But if I come back to this thing and can’t remember that it was more about deceit than space critters, I’ll waste my own time. I want that note.
I could put it into a blog. Possibly I should. If there’s an annotating tool inside Goodreads, though, then those “motivations” might be shared with my fellow-travelers–you, Mq., JH, and whom ever else stumbles into this almost-a-party.
What do you know about this tool that might help me? Please advise.